Jump to content

2+ ensemble syncing


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

is there long rest example l1.r..... (or longer) and so on in your 3ml? and i assume that both part have T# on them?

Edited by Unknown
Posted (edited)

How bad is the sync and when does it begin, from the start or mid way? If it starts at the beginning it may just be lag? or your tempo is not placed properly.

Edited by Unknown
Posted

If you used only one tempo for all the instruments, it should be fine. If you're changing up the tempo, that's where the desync should be. I'm not really certain of any other desyncs besides this one of tempo change.

Posted

 

melody 1:   t80b8>f#8ee8d16e16&e16f#8&f#16<b8>f#8e8f#8a8f#16e8f#16<b8r8>f#8
harmony 1: t80r8r8r1r1
harmony 2: t80r8r8r1r1
 

melody 1:   t80r8r8o3g8&g&g8a2<f#8&f#&f#8ba
harmony 1: t80r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2
harmony 2: t80r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

Posted

 

melody 1:   t80b8>f#8ee8d16e16&e16f#8&f#16<b8>f#8e8f#8a8f#16e8f#16<b8r8>f#8
harmony 1: t80r8r8r1r1
harmony 2: t80r8r8r1r1
 

melody 1:   t80r8r8o3g8&g&g8a2<f#8&f#&f#8ba
harmony 1: t80r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2
harmony 2: t80r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

 

harmony 1: r8r8r1r1
harmony 2: r8r8r1r1
 


harmony 1: r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2
harmony 2: r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

you dont really have to put a tempo on every track your code seems fine it might just be lag like unknown says.

Posted (edited)

Are you mistaking, tuning with sync? Just wondering, I don't see anything wrong with what you've written. And I only assume so because there is no tuner written in for your duet.

Edited by Unknown
Posted
 

melody 1:   t80r8r8o3g8&g&g8a2<f#8&f#&f#8ba
harmony 1: t80r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2
harmony 2: t80r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

​The problem is in your second instrument. Also, as stated above, you only need tempo once per instrument, but the actual problem is that Mabinogi's MML parsing is buggy and messes up the duration of rests if you put them near a tempo change. You can fix it by replacing any rests near a tempo change with a note at 0 volume instead. So for your above example, can be fixed like this (I'm assuming you're using volume 15 but you can adjust it to any volume you want):

melody 1: t80v0c8c8v15o3g8&g&g8a2<f#8&f#&f#8ba

harmony 1: v15r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2

harmony 2: v15r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

Posted

 

harmony 1: r8r8r1r1
harmony 2: r8r8r1r1
 


harmony 1: r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2
harmony 2: r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

you dont really have to put a tempo on every track your code seems fine it might just be lag like unknown says.

​its a habit i guess. once u optimize everything it doesn't really matter. when i write stuff i write it in a way i understand and can see stuff easier.

Are you mistaking, tuning with sync? Just wondering, I don't see anything wrong with what you've written. And I only assume so because there is no tuner written in for your duet.

No im not mistaking a tuner with snyc. Dont really put a tuner, but if u can tell your music isnt playing right that your tuner. although a tuner does make it easier to spot a wrong play.

​The problem is in your second instrument. Also, as stated above, you only need tempo once per instrument, but the actual problem is that Mabinogi's MML parsing is buggy and messes up the duration of rests if you put them near a tempo change. You can fix it by replacing any rests near a tempo change with a note at 0 volume instead. So for your above example, can be fixed like this (I'm assuming you're using volume 15 but you can adjust it to any volume you want):

melody 1: t80v0c8c8v15o3g8&g&g8a2<f#8&f#&f#8ba

harmony 1: v15r8r8r8g&g8r2r8c#&c#8r2

harmony 2: v15r8r8r8b&b8r2r8e&e8r2

​I didnt know that tempo rest thing, thanks for the info :D

 

×
×
  • Create New...